Learning from Coventry
Report from European Association for Teaching of Academic Writing Having returned to the Copenhagen offices of our independent communication consultancy (GlobalDenmark), and after being thoroughly inspired by old and (mostly) new acquaintances at Coventry, we'd like to share a few reflections on the aims of EATAW and our first visit to an EATAW conference. Of course, it was the people we met, listened to and talked with that made the greatest impression on us - fulfilling EATAW's aim of connecting teachers (like ourselves) and scholars of academic writing. We took part in many fruitful discussions and experienced a measure of "family belonging". The conference was extremely useful as a means of expanding our international network. We also exchanged diverse experience and know-how about academic writing teaching. On the positive side, we heard about many research findings that correspond with what and how we teach at GlobalDenmark. Issues we found particularly interesting included how writing cultures vary from country to country, the use of peer assessment for feedback, and writing as a social practice. We were greatly stimulated by how differently academic writing was taught and learned. Logistically, we saw the conference as nothing less than a masterpiece!
Concerns
Turning "us" and "them" into stakeholders with common goals Such a dialogue could have taken place at EATAW 2009, though to our knowledge it only actually occurred on a limited scale. The conference was a showpiece for professionalism in writing development, where an impressive array of writing development professionals from around the world inspired one another. However, on returning from the conference, we felt that some potential members of the family were missing - the other key stakeholders in academic writing. What is a great asset in the EATAW setting is also what we suggest be challenged. Rather than consolidating the "family atmosphere" of scholars of writing development, it would be stimulating to involve some of these other key stakeholders: politicians, decision makers at universities, representatives from industry, researchers and students. In this way it will be possible to build "the relevance bridge" between writing development and the purpose it is intended to serve. We can find common goals and inspiration if we work together as stakeholders. All in all the conference was inspiring, thought-provoking and enjoyable. Thanks to all who contributed to making it so - we look forward to seeing many of you again (and hopefully some other stakeholders!) at the next EATAW conference. |
Link to |